LawyerKM

I’ll be conducting a series of four short (20-30 minute) webinars in association with LexisNexis.  The series will be tied to my Knowledge Management 101 blog posts.  Those posts, and the webinars, are intended to give people a basic introduction to KM in the legal industry (hence the “101″ designation).  If you’re a KM whiz, like many of my readers, you may not get much out of the series, but if you know someone in the legal industry who wants to begin to understand what KM is all about, please let them know.

And just for kicks, I thought we might try to use Twitter as the platform for questions and answers. During the sessions, you can send a “tweet” to me at @LawyerKM and include the hash tag “#KM101“.  I’ll be monitoring Twitter and I’ll try to answer any questions you may have.

Here is the schedule and description for each webinar (or visit the LexisNexis sign-up page for all four):

1. Introduction to Legal Knowledge Management – Wed, April 8 – 3:00 PM

Knowledge management is nothing new, but there is still no agreed-upon definition. The way organizations implement KM efforts and initiatives varies widely; and law firms are no exception. This session will be a general introduction to knowledge management, focusing on the basics. It aims to help you decide whether to introduce KM at your firm, and how it can help — not only in the practice of law, but also in the business of law. A question & answer session will follow the presentation.

2. What Do We Know? Document Management and Retrieval Systems – Wed, April 22 – 3:00 PM

Picking up where session one left off, this session will focus on the “What we know” of knowledge management. Most firms have been around for many years. They have amassed collections of documents that contain the firm’s “institutional knowledge” or “collective work product.” The ability to quickly and easily access and reuse the models, samples, forms, and precedent documents allows lawyers to leverage the work of their colleagues to ensure high quality work product in a efficient, cost effective manner. A question & answer session will follow the presentation.

3. Who Do We Know? Contacts, Connections, and Social Networking for Lawyers and the Legal Profession – Wed, May 6 – 3:00 PM

Knowledge management is not just about documents. It’s also about finding the people (both inside and outside of the firm) who can help you get the job done or help with business development. This session will focus on the importance of the “who we know” aspects of knowledge management. Many firms have seen significant growth in the past decade. At some smaller firms, everyone knows everyone, and their areas of expertise. However, as firms grow and add lateral attorneys, it becomes more difficult to really know your colleagues and the their specialties. Cross-selling legal services to existing clients becomes difficult because attorneys may not know who at their firms can assist. This session will also look at connections outside of the law firm, and discuss how social networking can help solve the “who do we know” problem.  A question & answer session will follow the presentation.

4. Intranets, Portals, Web 2.0 & Enterprise 2.0 – Wed, May 20 – 3:00 PM

Knowledge Management is not all about technology, but it certainly helps. Today, we’ll discuss how intranets/portals can play a central role in your firm’s KM strategy, and can provide a single place to access much of the information that lawyers and staff need to do their jobs efficiently and effectively. We’ll also look at Web 2.0 tools (blogs, wikis, etc.) and see how they can be used both inside (referred to as Enterprise 2.0) and outside the law firm.  A question & answer session will follow the presentation.

LawyerKM :: Knowledge Management & Technology for Lawyers and Law Firms

Web 2.0 Expo Wrap-up Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Thanks to Doug Cornelius at KM Space, I was able to attend the Web 2.0 Expo in NYC.  Instead of taking paper notes (speaking of paper-free, I wish I had one of these), I tapped them out on my laptop, and figured that I would share them with you.  They are rough (so please excuse any typos).

Today’s Workshop: Enterprise 2.0 Jumpstart

• Old office systems were clunky, required too much IT involvement, etc.
• The consumer web started to change – offer improved direction and features: blogging, etc.
• the volume of information changed: email, IM etc. have greatly increased to amount of data floating around the enterprise.
• People started to realize that Individuals — regardless of rank — offer solutions.  So, there was a need to give them the tools – the ability to contribute.

Vander Wal described his Four Rings of Social Enterprise:

1. the tools: blogs, wikis, feeds, social bookmarking, voting, profiles, widgets, mashups, favoriting, comments.
2. interface / ease of use: this is the platform, e.g., oracle, SharePoint [1&2 combine to make up the usability; eventually, the tools get out of the way, if the software is smart enough, it can take unstructured data and know what to do with it to make it actionable (e.g., stikkit.com)]
3. Sociality: what are your relationships you have with others?  who do you want to share with?  everyone?  select people or groups?  [tools and sociality combine to make intelligence and business needs].  There are “spheres of sociality”  personal, selective, collective, the mob.
4. Encouraging use: this is easy for younger employees.   [The combination of encouraging use and sociality leads to"social comfort"] – show success stories regularly; buiild and show use cases; manage the community – promote contributed content.  Show how good ideas in one part of the organization can be applied to another part of the organization.

Benefits and Cautions of Enterprise 2.0 (Inside, Outside and Through the Firewall)

I’m very interested in how different generations of lawyers and legal staff will affect the way law firms will operate.  See Attorney 2.0 – Generation Y in Your Law Firm.   Here’s my coverage of a related ILTA program called Baby Boomers and Generation X and Generation Y – Addressing Generation Gaps in Culture and Technology in the Legal Industry. 

ILTA – August 28, 2008 2:00 pm

These are my notes from the ILTA program [Since I am taking paper-free notes and because there is free Wi-Fi here, I thought that I’d add the notes to the blog.  Disclaimer: my notes are rough, so forgive the typos.]

From ILTA:

Title: Baby Boomers and Generation X and Generation Y – Addressing Generation Gaps in Culture and Technology in the Legal Industry  – slides
Description: Are law firms dealing with the reality that there are real differences in how the various generations perceive the world, the expectations they have around technology and mobility, and how they relate to each other and member of different generations?  With most law firms being run by Boomers, we need to consider the issues around the fact that most new attorneys and staff are members of gen-X, gen-Y or gen-ME.
Speaker(s): Mark Cameron Willis – Kutak Rock LLP
Matthew Willis – IKON Office Solutions, Inc.
Learning Objectives: Learn new approaches to management.

LawyerKM’s Notes:

Today’s Emerging Law Firm

• Many firms have been involved in mergers and acquisitions
  Firms are operating like larger companies (they have c-level people)
  There is a global practice
  Competition for institutional clients
  multi-generational workplace

Generation Characteristics

Traditionalist

• Characteristics:
  64+ years old (5% of firm population)
  traditional family values
  loyalty to firm
  strong work ethic
• Legal practice:
  not tech savvy
  prefer phone vs email
  traditional legal practice – value of relationships
• Value to Firm:
  loyal clients
  relatinships in community / practice areas
  good mentors (valued by younger generations)
• Myths / perceptions:
  perception - that this group has stopped learning
  reality – they have vast knowledge

Baby Boomer

• Characteristics:
  late 40-60’s (70% of law firm partners)
  they surpassed the former generation many ways (e.g., first to go to college, etc.)
  work your way up mentality
  the “me generation” – affluent
  work-a-holics
• Legal practice:
  loyal clients
  traditional legal practice, but they embrace change dictated by their clients
  client-service oriented
• Value to Firm:
  managing the firm
  transition from traditional practice
  these people run the firm
• Myths / perceptions:
  perception – they are obsolete
  reality – they run the firm
  perception – work-a-holic
  reality – hard workers

Generation X

• Characteristics:
  30s / 40s year old
  saw 50% divorce rate growing up
  7-8 career changes
  consider themselves as “free agents”
• Legal practice:
  traditional legal training- research and writing
  they question traditional firm policies
  first generation to adopt technology advances (e.g., Westlaw and Lexis)
• Value to Firm:
  money makers
  control day-to-day relationship with clients
  they embrace technology
• Myths / perceptions:
  perception – self-centered (e.g., salary hikes)
  reality – family-centered
  perception – sense of entitlement
  reality – unwilling to sacrifice personal life for firm
  perception – “slackers”
  reality – maybe, but positive response to challenges

Generation Y

• Characteristics and values:
  late 20s year olds
  quality of life
  brought up on technology in school and in social networks
  “trophy generation” – they need a reward for what they’ve done
• Legal practice:
  technology is the backbone of practice
  diversity
  few strong client relatinships
  pressure to bill hours
• Value to Firm:
  fresh insight
  resourceful and adaptable
  teaching boomers and traditionalists
  access to information (e.g., Findlaw)
• Myths / perceptions:
  perception – undisciplined
  reality – they actually crave structure
  perception – they challenge authority
  reality – they crave to learn from their elders
  perception – disrespectful
  reality – they tend to treat everyone as equals

Firms Adjusting to the generation gaps:
Check out the matrix in the slides that show differences
Communications: face-to-face > telephone > email> email/text/sms
Bridging the generation gap

HR:
offices are designed to attract and keep employees (i.e., Google style vs. Stuffy NYC firm style)
quality of life – some firms have QoL committees
telecommuting
feedback that matches the generational needs
firm evaluations (the employee can offer reverse feedback)
mentoring
meaningful work
pro bono opportunities

Technology:
Education and training (training up and down, promoting new technology – wikis, web hosting, webinars, virtual conferneces)
Showed Common Craft’s Wikis in Plain English – the audience actually applauded this video – they loved it.
Technology committee – involving tech end users in tech decisions; comparing tech with corporate clients

Marketing: the new way of marketing involves blogs

LawyerKM :: Knowledge Management & Technology for Lawyers and Law Firms

ILTA – August 27, 2008 1:00 pm

These are my notes from the program.  [Since I am taking paper-free notes and because there is free Wi-Fi here, I thought that I’d add the notes to the blog.  Disclaimer: my notes are rough, so forgive the typos.]

From ILTA – See the description and download the slides here

Title: Web 2.0 – Law Firm Adoption
Description: As Web2.0 tools mature, there is an increased number of adoptions by Fortune 500 companies.  We explore and learn if Web 2.0 solutions already being adapted by Fortune 500 companies would be accepted by the lawyers in your firm.
Speaker(s): Bruce MacEwen – Adam Smith, Esq.

Learning Objectives: Learn how the new Web 2.0 tools are being utilized by Fortune 500 companies and its potential impact for law firms.
Analyze adoption rates amongst law firms.

LawyerKM’s notes:

These notes are highlights, you can see the slides on the ILTA site.
Bruce has many good diagrams in his presentation – check it out.

Web 2.0 Agenda:

• Blogs
• Wikis
• Mashups
• Social Networking
• Implications for law firms

The nature of the web and how it has changed:

Web 1.0 > Web 1.5 > Web 2.0
key difference is 1.0=surf, 1.5=search,  2.0=share

Blogs 101
23 blogs known in 1999
125 million blogs in 2008

Blogs as a management tool: a place in professional services firms because there are so many advantages over email.

Blog Basics:
important to have firm-wide blogging policies
you’re personally responsibe
respect and keep secretsinclude positive and negative comments (for credibility); some firms use blogs just for a replacement of client alerts, etc. and disallow comments (whether your firm does this depends on the culture)
be nice

Be Aware:
there is significant time committment to blogging.
your firm may require legal approval

Do’s & Don’ts:
there were a number of these, see the slides link above.
Highlights: don’t get defensive; develop a tone of voice – there is a brand aspect to your blog, a brand is a promise to your readers.

Why blog?
Internally – facilitates collaboration
Externally- demonstrates expertise

Web 2.0 [and Enterprised 2.0] –  At the heart of the knowledge management function; also at the heart of the project management function.

What lawyers do (cases, deals, etc.) are projects.  The intrinsic characteristics of blogs lend themselves to project manaement – the most recent thing is on top.

The way a firm is organized is usually different that the way people interact (see Bruce’s diagram)

Wikis
like a blog with multiple authors (e.g. wikipedia)
“it will never work in theory, but it works in practice”
the concerns that people will vandalize wiki pages is unfounded (if it happens, the good people will fix it and the vandals will be exposed)
Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein reported 75% drop in email on projects after implementing wikis.
There is very little instruction required.

There is not much downside to trying out wikis and blogs becuase they are generally inexpensive and they are generally accepted because they mirror the way people work.

Mashups
Definition: basically mixing two or more databases together (e.g. craigslist rentals with google maps or chicago crime with google maps)
Hypo – key clients mashup with a map of an area – could have real value to a firm.
Hypo – “caller ID on steroids” when a client calls, identifies the person as a client, it pulls up all types of firm info and a news feed related to the client.  [this is a great idea - other than this I haven't heard too many good ideas for mashups in organizations].  this is real “just in time” information that can be very useful for lawyers – getting the right information to the right people at the right time.

This stuff is not “high tech” it is “appropriate tech”

Social Networks
MySpace, Facebook, LinkedIn, Legal OnRamp (specifically for lawyers).

Bruce is disturbed by the number of members and the presence detection features of Legal OnRamp.   [to me this is of minor concern - better platforms, like Facebook allow better control over privacy and presence detection].

Success Stories:
there are some anecdotes, but most are struggling for a balance

McKinsey study: companys are shifting from experimental to broad adoption.  But, 21% were satisfied and 22 were not satified.
Specific internal uses: KM is 83%
External uses: improving client services is 73%

Leadership buy-in, promotion, and endorsement are keys to the success of social networking.  [in my view, this certainly is the key.  you may get some adoption, without it, but it will never be widely adotped and considered a success without it.]

Main take-away: power of the tools is to strengthen relationships that already exist.  It requires business and IT / KM to really collaborate.  It is the IT / KM job to identify new tools, such as social networking, and for senior management to push it forward.

LawyerKM :: Knowledge Management & Technology for Lawyers and Law Firms

ILTA – August 27, 2008 9:00 am

These are my notes from the program. [Since I am taking paper-free notes and because there is free Wi-Fi here, I thought that I’d add the notes to the blog. Disclaimer: my notes are rough, so forgive the typos.]

From ILTA:

Title: Legal Aspects of Collaboration Tools (Blogs, Wikis, MashUps, IM, Text Messages, Social Networks and More)
Description: Collaboration technologies help promote information sharing, efficiency, cost reduction and can provide competitive advantages. How does the legal environment deal with the information overload and the security of confidential information escaping the realm of the organization? What aspects of legal information need to be considered to help determine how collaboration tools should be utilized in the legal world (and when they should not)? What policies must be in place to protect the shared information?

Speaker(s): Tom Mighell – Cowles & Thompson, P.C.
Dennis Kennedy – MasterCard Worldwide

LawyerKM’s notes:

• See my notes from yesterday’s presentation
• Collaboration is no longer an option.
• Web tools are moving beyond email.
• News and communication:
  Blogs -
  IM -
  Twitter -
• Working together:
  Documents – drafts & revisions: the old way was redlining.
  Conferencing – scheduling is a major difficulty and very time consuming.
  Wikis -
• Web 2.0
  1.0 – focus was getting all the info online – no interaction
  2.0 – making the info available to people in more interesting, interactive ways (e.g. Google Maps, Mashups); moving to user-generated content (e.g., wikis and blogs); software as a service (SAAS); cloud computing.
  e.g., Yelp, Delicious, social networking tools, Facebook and LinkedIn are the main players.
  Martindale-Hubbell is testing their own social network (should be coming out in the next couple of months.
  Mashups – SharePoint can be used to mashup information
  Google Sites – allows you to make a mini portal platform on the web
• The benefits of collaboration:
  1. taking an active role
  2. enhancing the workflow
  3. getting better results
• Potential Problems of collaboration:
  1. Loss of control – lawyers are tought that they should control the draft and the drafting proscess. Collaborative drafting (like with Google Docs) can take away this feeling of control, blog comments and wikis also may contribute to the feeling of loss of control. Internal vs. external storage (many lawyers are not comfortable with their data on external servers) there is also the issue of down time of third-party systems.
  2. Security – because you are going outside the firewall, there is a concern. You are potentialll opening up multiple points of compromise.
  3. Ethics – need to be a lawyer’s ethical responsibilities. There have not been many ethics decisions about technology. None were cited about collaboration. Is encryption mandatory? Metadata – one state has found that lawyers should have knowledge that metadata exists in their documents.
• The Balance between riks and benefits:
  1. Cultural – what is the tolerance for risk at your firm? Balanced scorecard, risk-reward framework.
  2. Costs – many of these tools are free – so lawyers might be inclined to try it out. But, some of those tools may be risky. Hidden costs – free tools have implimentation issues [and what about ads in Gmail].
  3. Portfolio approach – is an economic portfolio approach right (i.e., having a diversified portfolio)? Check out some of the collaboration tools.
• Defining and Implementing Appropriate Policies:
  1. channel appropriate behaviors – lawyers are good at finding work-arounds when they can’t get what they need.
  2. keeping control – policies, procedures, processes – need some sort of formality to it. Very few people in the audience have any sort of policies or procedures that cover collaboration tools.
  3. security and ethical concers – #1 is confidentiality; different levels of access, authority are key to this.
• Looking into the Future
  1. recent devlopments – since the cost of travel is high, there is/will be an increase in online collaboration.
  2. trends – web2.0 is becoming more common and people are willing to explore
  3. predicions – clients will drive this (if they want it, lawyers will provide it) video will be bigger in the future
• Conclusions:
  1. keep current – read blogs [like LawyerKM!]
  2. action steps – find your firms policies; look at the tools that you use; think about the issues that arise with the tools that you use.

LawyerKM :: Knowledge Management & Technology for Lawyers and Law Firms

ILTA – August 26, 2008 3:30 pm

These are my notes from the program.  [Since I am taking paper-free notes and because there is free Wi-Fi here, I thought that I’d add the notes to the blog.  Disclaimer: my notes are rough, so forgive the typos.]

From ILTA:

Title:   Collaboration Tools and Technologies for Lawyers

Description:     Collaboration technologies and tools are the most important current developments in legal technology and are likely to remain so for the foreseeable future. During this session, the speakers discuss collaboration technologies for law firms, review tools and explore alternative platforms.

Speaker(s):     

Tom Mighell – Cowles & Thompson, P.C.

Dennis Kennedy – MasterCard Worldwide

Learning Objectives:  

Identify collaboration tools and technologies for law firms.

Analyze their utilization and explore alternative methods.

LawyerKM’s Notes:

• Do you know how your lawyers are collaborating?
  • email
  • wikis
  • meetings
  • SharePoint
  • etc.
• Collaboration is not new
  • history of collaborating
  • telegraph is the first form of IM (sort of)
  • telephone
• Collaboration today
  • mainly email 
  • document collaboration (redlining, track revisions, etc.)
  • conference calls
• Internal & external collaboration
  • geography and the parties are factors
  • audience is important – e.g. metadata stripping is important when collaborating with third parties, but not necessarily with internal parties
  • Internal: everyone on the same team, see metadata above; brainstorming, etc. openness about the documents
  • External: the collaborators might be on the same side, but might be adversaries.
• Basics: Documents and Projects
  • Documents – take advantage of the fact that documents are in a digital format.
    • Redlining and track changes are the norm today
    • Google Docs – a place for multiple people to collaborate on a document (Dennis and Tom used Google Docs to collaborate when writing their book: The Lawyer’s Guide to Collaboration Tools and Technologies: Smart Ways to Work Together)
  • Project Management – lawyers are very much project managers
    • they need to manage the cases and / or deals that they are working on
• Basic Collaboration Toolbox
  • choice depends on how you work
  • determining what you’re trying to do helps you match tools to the problem
  • calendaring, conferencing, document collaboration
• Collaboration Platforms
  • SharePoint
  • Google Apps (Dennis is surprised at the interest in this from a large law firm perspective – so am I see Web 2.0 in Law Firms)
• Web 2.0 Tools
  • key definition – using the internet as a software tool or application platform  (web 3.0 is the semantic web, see here)
  • Blogs, Wikis, Cloud computing
  • they are platform agnostic (PC or Mac – all the same – you just need a web browser)
  • Calendaring on the web allows easy collaboration
  • web-based large file sharing (e.g. Drop IO, usendit)
• Next Generation Concepts
  • user-generated content publishing (see, e.g., Wikipedia, YouTube, SlideShare, Mash-ups)
  • social networking (LinkedIn, Facebook) becomes an expertise locator.  [what about Twitter?]
  • Legal OnRamp, JD Supra
• How to learn about collaboration options
  • lots of collaboration blogs: Dennis and Tom’s blog
  • RSS feeds (subscribe to collaboration tag in technorati)
• Approaches to develop a collaboration strategy
  • is your approach active or passive?
  • collaboration audit – don’t assume that you know how your attorneys are collaborating – check it out. 
  • what is your firm’s collaborative culture?  - look at the way people actually work (even from a non-technological way)
• Defining and Implementing your collaboration approach
  • try to guide people to accepted products and approaches
• What is your collaboration culture?
  • the audit will help
  • what are people doing now
  • strengthen collaboration culture – establish a collaboration coordinator [sounds like a KM position; an evangelist]
  • let people know about successes
  • learn from your failures
• Conclusions
  • no longer an option
  • impact on day to day practice can be huge
• What to do next?
  • observe how you are collaborating (notice what tools you use)
  • pick one tool and investigate it

LawyerKM :: Knowledge Management & Technology for Lawyers and Law Firms

ILTA – August 26, 2008 9:00 am

These are my notes from the program.  [Since I am taking paper-free notes and because there is free Wi-Fi here, I thought that I’d add the notes to the blog.  Disclaimer: my notes are rough, so forgive the typos.]

From ILTA:

Title: Recap of G100 CIO Event – Web 2.0 Focus

Description: Join the G100 CIO Advisory Board as they provide a recap of the G100 CIO event held on Monday, August 25 in conjunction with ILTA ‘08.  The focus is “Web 2.0 – What It Means to Law Firms,” including a summary of what Rajen Sheth, Senior Product Manager for Google Apps shared with the group around the phenomenon of Web 2.0 in general.
Date/Time: 8/26/2008 9:00 a.m.
Location: Fort Worth 5,6,7
Speaker(s): Peter Lesser – Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP
David Rigali – Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP
Karen Levy – Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Peter Attwood – Simmons & Simmons

LawyerKM’s notes:

• The panel recapped the G100 CIO Advisory Board meeting from 8/25/08
• What is Web 2.0?
• an aspect of collaboration rather than just web consuption.
• structured vs. unstructured data – it may be ok to have multiple collaborators.
• Is it different the Enterprise 2.0? – trying to take the concepts of web 2.0 and incorporate them in organizations.
• At Mallesons wikis started with IT staff and now it is among the practice groups – someof the most prolific users are the more senior attorneys.  average age of partner there is 39 (is this a factor?)
  • Firm culture is important – some use DMS as a confidential repository, some have them open.  The latter may find wikis more acceptable. 
  • They has a client facing wiki.
  • They allow people to even restructure the wiki page.
  • Firms are not looking to IT to set it up.  It is very low cost. 
  • Use: from a practice group perspective, the wiki content was not a part of the record (i.e., the matter records) – the content is more practice-group related rather than matter related. 
  • Some fear contributions to wikis becuase they don’t want to be seen as having written something stupid.
  • The wikis are getting 1000 hits per day. 
  • Best adoption was in IP practice group.
  • In technology department they have a wiki page for their meeting agendas.
• The panel was asked if they will use wikis.
  • Lesser said not now, but didn’t rule it out for the future.  It is a cultural thing.
  • Levy – there are ways to introduce it (admin first, perhaps) – find out where it fits.  It’s a tool and it may fit some problems, not others.
  • Attwood – has tried it in IT, some have worked, others not, agrees with Levy
  • Brandt – thought was – if it is “cheap to fail” why not try it. 
• Question: what about blogging?
  • Lesser’s firm has a policy against it – presumably refering to external blogs (but there is one internal blog).
• What about the fear of discovery (from a litigation perspective)?
  • Brandt – the stuff is still there (now it’s just in email and other electronic places) [great point - people need to understnad this!!].  Levy agreed. 
• Google Apps (some of the notes below are beyond Google specifically)
  • idea is cloud computing and using Offie-style apps (like Word, email, spreadsheets, presentations) on Google’s servers. 
  • the price is fixed, the upgrades in functionality are frequent. 
  • Docs has full doc version control.
  • there is real time collaboration on documents.
  • Attwood was surprised how far forward Google is.
  • Lesser thought this was the most interesting topic.  Many in the room thought they might see this in the next 1-1.5 years.  It may be client driven (if a client adopts it, law firms may have to adopt it as well). 
  • The thought was to sit with Google to adjust it to make it legal specific.
  • The functionality is very far from the feature set that we are used to from Microsoft. 
  • Security seems to be there.  It is encrypted. 
  • Google allows you to tie in your own authentication methods
  • There was debate about whether firms are ready to give up all they have done in the last 10-15 years. 
  • Many firms are looking at getting away from a specialiszed approach and going for a more corporate approach.  Stop making and using customized applications and use more standardized applications.
  • The cost issue (often 1/10 of what the existing systems might cost) may be the thing that convinces partners to move away from the customized apps and go for more standardized apps.
  • The panel agreed that communicating with Google early on may convince them to focus on what they might be able to do to make it work for law firms.
  • A benefit to focusing on more out-of-the-box approach is that you can upgrade quickly. 
  • The panel plans to reach out to Google and others, like Microsoft, etc. to see how firms can move in this direction.
• One take away
• Levy – the dramatic gap in cost between the traditional approach and the new Google approach.
• Attwood – this is moving much faster than he thought. 
• Lesser – thinks that the whole cloud computing could work.
• Brandt – There seems to be no real road map to the development of the products – it is based on user feedback, which is good.

It was refreshing to hear such forward-looking ideas on the panel. 

LawyerKM :: Knowledge Management & Technology for Lawyers and Law Firms

Ark Group & Managing Partner Magazine have announced the 4th Annual program for “Knowledge Management In The Modern Law Firm: Creating Value for Your Firm by Integrating, Optimizing and Leveraging Your Knowledge Assets, Tools and Techniques in Support Of Explicit Business Goals.” It is scheduled for October 27-28, 2008 in Chicago, IL.

If history repeats, this will be a good conference.

Here’s the line up:

What Do Practicing Lawyers Expect from the KM Function?

• Mark Young, Managing Partner, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
• John S. Gillies, Director of Practice Support, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP

Can IT and KM Both Be Strategic and Operational?

• Peter K. Kaomea, Chief Information Officer, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
• Tom Baldwin, [blog] Chief Knowledge Officer, Reed Smith, LLP
• Stuart Kay, Director, Global Information Systems Projects, Baker & McKenzie

The Convergence of Litigation Support, Practice Support, Risk Management and Client Services

• Brent E. Kidwell, Chief Knowledge Counsel, Jenner & Block LLP
• Stacie Capshaw, Firmwide Records Manager, Kirkland & Ellis LLP

Can Transactional-Based KM Practices be Extended to Support Litigation?

• Amy Halverson, Litigation Knowledge Manager, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
• David B. Hobbie, [blog] Litigation Knowledge Manager, Goodwin Procter LLP
• Mary Panetta, Director of Knowledge Management, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld

Fostering and Nurturing the Research & Development Function at Your Firm

• David B. Hobbie, [blog] Litigation Knowledge Manager, Goodwin Procter LLP

Words by the Numbers: Using Multi-Faceted Analytics to Drive KM in an International Law Firm

• Peter K. Kaomea, Chief Information Officer, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP

A Retrospective Look at KM Initiatives Across Law Firms (Has DM peaked? The evolution of practice-based web services and the consignment of DM to the back-end, Portals – one solution or a myriad of opportunities?)

• Joel Alleyne, CMC, former Chief Information and Knowledge Officer, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Chairman and CEO, Alleyne Inc.
• Joshua Fireman, Vice-President Market Development and General Counsel, ii3

Enterprise Search: Holy Grail, Panacea or a Failed Opportunity? (From content and collection to context and collaboration, Web 2.0 and its impact on longstanding KM problems, KM opportunities that KM professionals never seem to exploit)

• Joel Alleyne, CMC, former Chief Information and Knowledge Officer, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Chairman and CEO, Alleyne Inc.
• Joshua Fireman, Vice-President Market Development and General Counsel, ii3
• Terrie J. Rollins, CEO, RMR Technology Group and former CKO, Federal Systems, Unisys corp.

Contact Peter Franken for more info:
773 281 4275
pfranken@ark-group.com
usa.ark-group.com

LawyerKM :: Knowledge Management & Technology for Lawyers and Law Firms

This was a fantastic webinar from KMWorld and Google:

Innovation @ Google: A Day In The Life

On March 11, 2008, Naveen Viswanatha, Sales Engineer at Google Enterprise gave a really great presentation. 

My notes from the presentation: 

• Broad background of Google and Google Enterprise, touting customer base, etc.
• Internet Evolution – from information to distribution & communitaction to network & platform.
• Chronology of how Google evolved with the internet – timeline with their many online products.
• “Innovation is at the core of Google’s competiveness.” 
• 70-20-10 Rule – i.e. Google splits its business focus: 70% focus on core business (Search, Ads, Apps); 20% on things with strong potential (blogger, Picassa, News, Pack); 10% Wild and Crazy (offline adds, wifi, transit).   
• How Google hires people – the hiring process is “painfull.” (See Fast Company article: “Our hiring process is legendary”
• Google has a relatively flat management structure. 
• Internal tool called “Snippets” (a nag email: what did you work on last week? – what are you working on this week?) – so you can track your work.  AND it is a knowledge-base tool because everyone else can search all other snippets and get information on what they may be working on. 
• Google Ideas database – post and review ideas within Google – people can comment on and vet out the ideas.  The ideas might turn into an actual project.  [plus, it records the things that are Google's intellectual property] – it uses the “wisdom of the crowds” philosophy.
• Innovation is a collaborative process at Google -  ”Innovation = Discovery + Collaboration (+ Fun)” 
• First day at Google is “like drinking from a firehose”
• Any questions – go to “Moma” – Google’s internal knowledge base - search of their key knowledge areas. 
• Can look for experts within the company – Google expert search within Moma - lots of an individual’s information is searchable (including resumes, which they encourage people to keep up to date).   
• Search results within Moma – you can take notes in the search results (of the things that you are searching) – uses Google Docs [I used Google Docs to take notes for this blog post] – and you can publish the notes — it publishes it out to the people you want (they use gMail, chat, Goolge Calendar – can overlay colleague’s calendars on top of your own so that you can schedule meetings, etc.). 
• Regarding the notes – others can make changes to your notes (which you created in Google Docs) in real time – you can see the changes on your screen. 
• It’s all about the “…ability to find and leverage collective wisdom of the organization…” 
• How are experts are established?  Expert databases are hard to keep upto date.  So they leverage the things that people do already: resumes, blogs, wikis, Snippets, Moma, etc.
• Are these tools avaiable to the public?  Yes and no.  Search is the key enabler to tap into the repositories that are already in use at your organization (touting Google Search Appliance). 

The event is archived: here  

I really encourage people to check this out.  Especially those who are new to KM.  This presentation gave a glimpse into Google as a company and it shows off some great ways that any organization can approach KM. 

LawyerKM :: Knowledge Management & Technology for Lawyers and Law Firms

Here are some of my favorite legal knowledge management & technology blog posts and other items from the week of – March 2 – 8 , 2008:

• Is Technology Failing to Simplify Life? (Tim Ferriss)
• Legal Issues from Facebook and Related Social Media Technologies: Panel Discussion (Slaw – Connie Crosby)
• Apple Aims to Put iPhone Into the Workplace [I hope they succeed] (NY Times)
• 10 guidelines for building your blog’s credibility (Real Lawyers Have Blogs)
• Web Technology Trends for 2008 and Beyond (Read Write Web)
• Social Networking Moves to the Cellphone (NY Times)
• Padded lampposts for distracted texters being tested in London (Engadget)
• What a feed reader can do for you (Caselines – David Hobbie)
• DLA Piper launches trainee internet portal (“…similar … to the popular social networking sites Facebook and Bebo…” Managing Partner Magazine)
• Document Management Systems (DMS) and Knowledge Management (Eric Blue’s Blog)
• Lifestream – Aggregating Youself (KM Space – Doug Cornelius)
• Federal Court to Put Information in Your Pocket (Law.com – Lynne Marek)
• If you must use PowerPoint, study Steve Jobs, Cory Doctorow, or Larry Lessig’s speeches (Scoble on Twitter)

LawyerKM :: Knowledge Management & Technology for Lawyers and Law Firms