<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Autonomy iManage Early Adopters (ILTA Presentation)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawyerkm.com/2009/08/25/autonomy-imanage-early-adopters-ilta-presentation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawyerkm.com/2009/08/25/autonomy-imanage-early-adopters-ilta-presentation/</link>
	<description>Knowledge Management, Technology &#38; Social Media for Lawyers and Law Firms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LAW_IT_GUY</title>
		<link>http://lawyerkm.com/2009/08/25/autonomy-imanage-early-adopters-ilta-presentation/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>LAW_IT_GUY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyerkm.com/?p=1382#comment-408</guid>
		<description>Re: 8.5 EMM -  While EMM 8.5 improves on the previous version, I&#039;m curious as to the impact on performance, and the requirements seem quite steep.  Pre 8.5 the EMM performance was a dog on the local workstations, now they are moving this to the communication and exchange servers. Is this good / bad???

Re: IDOL is very fast, but what is the hardware investment?

Re: Search response - related to hardware?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: 8.5 EMM &#8211;  While EMM 8.5 improves on the previous version, I&#8217;m curious as to the impact on performance, and the requirements seem quite steep.  Pre 8.5 the EMM performance was a dog on the local workstations, now they are moving this to the communication and exchange servers. Is this good / bad???</p>
<p>Re: IDOL is very fast, but what is the hardware investment?</p>
<p>Re: Search response &#8211; related to hardware?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://lawyerkm.com/2009/08/25/autonomy-imanage-early-adopters-ilta-presentation/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyerkm.com/?p=1382#comment-406</guid>
		<description>Sounds very complicated. It raises flags to me when they  say that it&#039;s going to take a lot more attention than the predecessor. Isn&#039;t their simpler and cheaper DMS solutions out there? Yes, I still want a feature rich DMS, but can&#039;t I get that without all devoting major attention to it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds very complicated. It raises flags to me when they  say that it&#8217;s going to take a lot more attention than the predecessor. Isn&#8217;t their simpler and cheaper DMS solutions out there? Yes, I still want a feature rich DMS, but can&#8217;t I get that without all devoting major attention to it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

