Comments on: Web 2.0 in Law Firms (from ILTA) | Knowledge Management http://lawyerkm.com/2008/08/26/web-20-in-law-firms-from-ilta-knowledge-management/ Knowledge Management, Technology & Social Media for Lawyers and Law Firms Mon, 21 May 2012 11:56:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Collaboration Tools and Technologies for Lawyers (at ILTA) Knowledge Management « LawyerKM http://lawyerkm.com/2008/08/26/web-20-in-law-firms-from-ilta-knowledge-management/comment-page-1/#comment-142 Collaboration Tools and Technologies for Lawyers (at ILTA) Knowledge Management « LawyerKM Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:50:24 +0000 http://lawyerkm.wordpress.com/?p=457#comment-142 [...] Google Apps (Dennis is surprised at the interest in this from a large law firm perspective – so am I see Web 2.0 in Law Firms) [...] [...] Google Apps (Dennis is surprised at the interest in this from a large law firm perspective – so am I see Web 2.0 in Law Firms) [...]

]]> By: Sean Brady http://lawyerkm.com/2008/08/26/web-20-in-law-firms-from-ilta-knowledge-management/comment-page-1/#comment-141 Sean Brady Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:36:30 +0000 http://lawyerkm.wordpress.com/?p=457#comment-141 I am surprised, and happy, to see so much enthusiasm for concept of cloud computing. What I find most interesting though is that people are actually talking about changing the Word addin model. I would love to develop the idea further. With our discussions turning to Office 2007, I have been asking people here again if we "have" to create documents like we do, or if we do it because we always have. there has got to be a better way. Thanks for all the write ups. I am surprised, and happy, to see so much enthusiasm for concept of cloud computing. What I find most interesting though is that people are actually talking about changing the Word addin model. I would love to develop the idea further. With our discussions turning to Office 2007, I have been asking people here again if we “have” to create documents like we do, or if we do it because we always have. there has got to be a better way.

Thanks for all the write ups.

]]>